Guess who passed the "bat-shit crazy" pro se petitioner test? This guy! [two thumbs pointed at chest] Much more to come shortly, but I have some work to do.
Mohegan Lake Legal Defense Fund
History of this site
This site was originally set up to fight 3 of 5 zoning variances proposed by the FBC development at Sagamore Trail and Mohegan Ave that eliminates two single family homes while nearly quadrupling the parking and occupancy loads of the old Lakeland Jewish Center. That effort failed and the application is currently before the Planning Board.
While Save Mohegan Lake will continue to update you on that issue, we are moving on to all issues affecting the lake, such as Mohegan Lake Improvement District (MLID) meetings, agenda and budget. This site is not an official mouthpiece for MLID, but some updates will be provided on this site; the official site is located here.
We do it all here, so long as it's Mohegan Lake related. Feel free to submit comments, content, garage sale notices, police blotters, PSA's, essays on the virtues of our 105 acre ice rink, rants, raves, etc... We love it all.
Email: YorktownCode@gmail.com
While Save Mohegan Lake will continue to update you on that issue, we are moving on to all issues affecting the lake, such as Mohegan Lake Improvement District (MLID) meetings, agenda and budget. This site is not an official mouthpiece for MLID, but some updates will be provided on this site; the official site is located here.
We do it all here, so long as it's Mohegan Lake related. Feel free to submit comments, content, garage sale notices, police blotters, PSA's, essays on the virtues of our 105 acre ice rink, rants, raves, etc... We love it all.
Email: YorktownCode@gmail.com
Friday, January 8, 2016
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Evan sorry but hoping you can clarify what this letter means exactly...
Thanks,
Peter
Hi Peter,
This means that I'll likely get my day in court. I am in the Second Appellate Division (NYS's highest court) trying to the void Zoning Board interpretation that a "house of worship is a residential use" which obviated the prohibition on parking for non-residential uses within the first 30' of the front yard. The Town and Church motioned to dismiss my brief (arguments) and appendix (copy of the record) saying it was inadequate. Court denied the dismissal so long as I serve a supplement to the appendix. That's basically what that letter means.
Post a Comment