Mohegan Lake Legal Defense Fund

History of this site

This site was originally set up to fight 3 of 5 zoning variances proposed by the FBC development at Sagamore Trail and Mohegan Ave that eliminates two single family homes while nearly quadrupling the parking and occupancy loads of the old Lakeland Jewish Center. That effort failed and the application is currently before the Planning Board.

While Save Mohegan Lake will continue to update you on that issue, we are moving on to all issues affecting the lake, such as Mohegan Lake Improvement District (MLID) meetings, agenda and budget. This site is not an official mouthpiece for MLID, but some updates will be provided on this site; the official site is located here.

We do it all here, so long as it's Mohegan Lake related. Feel free to submit comments, content, garage sale notices, police blotters, PSA's, essays on the virtues of our 105 acre ice rink, rants, raves, etc... We love it all.

Email: YorktownCode@gmail.com
Showing posts with label non-simultaneous occupancy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label non-simultaneous occupancy. Show all posts

Thursday, April 4, 2013

Faith Bible Church Planning Board Working Session 4/8/13

The subject application is on the Planning Board Agenda on Monday. 

In related news, I made amazing discovery today; it was was right under my nose for about 2.5 years.  I had underlined, doubled underlined, highlighted and made notations all around it.  I overlooked it, but it was there the whole time.  Zoning and code are exciting like that.  I did a fist pump and a little dance.  It is exactly one sentence of Yorktown zoning. 

It's not fair to link directly to it, but it's in there.  I will confirm my revelation with two zoning attorneys before I commit it to writing, but if I'm correct, the number of parking spaces they can provide as of right goes from 63, to 33.  Gasp.

Tuesday, March 12, 2013

Non-Simultaneous Occupancy?

Let me google that for you. Why?  Because SaveMoheganLake.com is the 3rd highest google result for "non-simultaneous occupancy."  Why such a high search result?  Because non-simultaneous occupancy is not a code supported concept and I've been very, very adamant on this site regarding such.

Click here to let me google that for you.