What's really upsetting is that this proposal requires major zoning variances. Eliminating 50% of the required side yard to build a multi-family building of this scale is notable. I'd say objectionable. The fact that the building separation is not correct,* yeah, that shakes may faith in the competency of the planning director.
Does the rezoning consider anything other than this random one acre lot?
No.
Does Yorktown have a master plan of the areas they propose to re-zone to R-2 and R-3 multi-family zoning districts?
No.
Should the Town consider re-zoning all of the parcels adjacent to this one acre hemmed in by Lexington Avenue, West Road, Ellis Street, and the Access Road at the Nursing Home?
Yes.
At least let that block cash out and move to a town of more reasonable planning goals. Heck, we could probably fit at least 344 units on that block. It's right next to the elementary school too. Perhaps we could make it a dormitory for the school which would be an as-of-right use in an R-3 Zone. I would so love it if GWES was a boarding school. I have four daughters. We'd be so close. It wouldn't be that bad, right?
Oh, hey, and did I mention that the applicant and Yorktown incorrectly calculated the front yard required. Yes, another variance is required (the Town doesn't really like to look closely at planning and zoning applications, in my opinion).**
*The Planning Director incorrectly notes the building separation between the buildings as 90 feet, where the code is clear that the separation between two main buildings is 100 feet, if it's based on table 300a. Would also note that the buildings--as designed--would exist completely within land requiring variances for them to be there. That's not normal.
**What's funny is that I literally got the applicant/town to agree to recalculate the front yard of FBC . Short memory.
No comments:
Post a Comment